GIS and Data Analysis

The GIS and data analysis component of Phase I began with the creation of a GIS database using the open source mapping application QGIS. This GIS database incorporates several layers of relevant geospatial data and species occurrence records, summarized in Table 4.

A preliminary map of the ecological communities represented at Xetthecum is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Preliminary map of Xetthecum (Retreat Cove, Galiano Island, BC) project area, highlighting important ecological communities as previously mapped through the UP-CLOSE participatory mapping workshops (Emmings & Erickson 2004). Important natural features identified during Phase I of this project include: 1) Greig Creek; 2) Laughlin Lake; 3) Retreat Cove caves; 4) Retreat Cove eelgrass bed; 5) Retreat Island. Note: the basemap (Open Streetmap) behind this map distorts the colours representing each community in the legend because of the overlay in transparencies. Figure 3 shows the updated styles adopted for the final version of the online map.

Linking geospatial data to the literature

We reviewed geospatial layers in our GIS and identified key features and attributes that could be mapped with content identified in our review of the literature (e.g., sensitive ecosystems documented in the Islands Trust Sensitive Ecosystem Guide). These resources were then tabulated based on common variables represented in the geospatial dataset, in order to facilitate the incorporation of these resources into our interactive map.

Species in the landscape and in the literature

Once existing ecocultural datasets had been tabulated, we ran algorithms to examine the overlap / correspondence between species present in the project area and information attributed to species in the available ecocultural literature.

  • A total of 524 species are documented in the project area, represented by 1,845 occurrence records.
  • Through our review of the available literature, we tabulated ecocultural information for a total of 303 species.
  • Between these two datasets, there was a one-to-one mapping or correspondence between 45 species (Table 7).

Table 7. Species Present at Xetthecum vs Species Represented in Ecocultural Literature

Species Documented at Xetthecum Species documented in Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group (2011) and Turner (2014) Correspondence
524 spp. 303 spp. 45 spp.

Based on the tables produced through this analysis, we integrated the results of our literature review with the biodiversity data collected from the study area, to visualize ecocultural content for a small subset of the species represented on our map of Retreat Cove (Table 8).

Additional sources of biodiversity data were later included through ongoing outreach, research, and field surveys. Species documented in the ecocultural literature which were not found in our initial species inventory of Xetthecum (= 258 taxa) were sought through inventory work conducted during Phase II.

Table 8. Correspondences between Local Species Occurrences and Species Documented in Ecocultural Resources (Phase I). Note: the orthographies used for Hul’q’umi’num’ names are inconsistent between sources.

Group Scientific Name Common English name Hul’q’umi’num’ Name Source
algae / kelp Nereocystis luetkeana bull kelp q’amʔ (Cowichan) Turner 2014
birds Anas platyrhynchos mallard Tunuqsun Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Athyrium filix-femina lady fern lə́q’ləq’ʔey’ Turner 2014
Cygnus buccinator trumpeter swan S-hwuw’qun Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
crustacean Cancer productus red rock crab Kwakwatl’shun Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
fishes Hexagrammos decagrammus kelp greenling Tth’umuqwa' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Ophiodon elongatus lingcod Eeyt Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
mammal Lontra canadensis river otter Sqeetl' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
mollusks Ariolimax columbianus banana slug Q’uyatl’un Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Mollusca molluscs (general) Q’uyatl’un Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Panopea generosa geoduck clam Pun’eq' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
plants Achillea millefolium yarrow tł’əlíqw’əłp (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Arbutus menziesii arbutus Qaanlhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Camassia leichtlinii great camas spánxw (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Carex obnupta slough sedge psháyʔ (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Cirsium vulgare bull thistle xəw’xəwíłp (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Cornus sericea red-osier dogwood sháalʔəłp (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Corylus cornuta beaked hazelnut P’qw’axw Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Equisetum telmateia giant horsetail Sxum’xum' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Fritillaria affinis chocolate lily stł’əlts’ə́ ləqw ’əs (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Gaultheria shallon salal T’eqe' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Goodyera oblongifolia rattlesnake plantain ʔeləʔnáw (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Holodiscus discolor ocean spray (ironwood) Qethulhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Lilium columbianum tiger lily Sxamelexwthelh Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Lysichiton americanus skunk cabbage ts’ákw’aʔ (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Oemleria cerasiformis bird cherry məә́ łxəәl’ (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass sáxw əl (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Poaceae grass (general) sáxw əl (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Prunus emarginata bitter cherry st’əә́ ləәm (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern Suqeen Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Quercus garryana Garry oak P’hwulhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Ribes bracteosum stink currant Sp’eetth' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Ribes divaricatum coastal black gooseberry t’ám’xw, t’émʔxw, t’ém’xw (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Rubus armeniacus Himalayan blackberry sqw’óolməәxw (Upriver Fraser) Turner 2014
Rubus leucodermis blackcap raspberry Tsulqama’ Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Rubus parviflorus thimbleberry T’uqwum' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Rubus spectabilis salmonberry Lila' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Scirpus microcarpus small-flowered bulrush psháyʔ (Cowichan) Turner 2014
Spiraea douglasii hardhack T’eets’ulhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Symphoricarpos albus snowberry P’up’q’iyasulhp, P’up’q’iyas, T’ets’ulhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Thuja plicata western redcedar Xpey' Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Tsuga heterophylla western hemlock Thq’iinlhp Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Urtica dioica stinging nettle Tth’uxtth’ux Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Vaccinium parvifolium red huckleberry Sqw’uqwtsus Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group 2011
Zostera marina eelgrass chəәləәm (Cowichan) Turner 2014

Guiding field work

To inform subsequent search efforts, we identified potential locations of culturally significant species present in the study area based on the ecological communities represented in our GIS.

Phase II field work later involved the selection of sites representative of each of the key ecological communities summarized in Table 5, which were inventoried with a focus on the ~300 species documented in Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group (2011), Turner (2014) and Luschiim (2021), in order to generate a rich ecocultural dataset for the purpose of this pilot project.

Florence James was consulted regarding the names of additional species, or variations of those documented by Hul’q’umi’num’ Treaty Group (2011), Turner (2014) and Luschiim (2021).

Residents in the Retreat Cove neighbourhood were also invited to participate in this biodiversity mapping initiative via iNaturalist. (Later, we teamed up with Hunterston Farms and other partner organizations to plan a BioBlitz at Xetthecum during Phase III of this project.)

Natural features and visual art

Finally, we identified a preliminary list of natural features to be documented in this project, identified in Figure 1, which may hold ecological and cultural value in the eyes of project participants. We continued the work of inventorying potentially important natural and cultural features of the landscape through Phase II.

In Phase I, we also began the process of exploring ways in which visual art produced by project participants may be integrated as layer styles / tiling for each ecological community, and to illustrate other features of our digital map (continued during Phase II).

Table 9 presents a summary of tasks related to GIS and ecocultural data analysis completed during Phase I.

Table 9. Phase I: GIS and Data Analysis Tasks

Task Start End
Create GIS framework based on existing geospatial datasets November 2020 December 2020
Compile historical and contemporary species occurrence records for project area November 2020 March 2022
Identify key features and attributes of geospatial datasets to facilitate ecocultural mapping November 2020 January 2021
Identify important natural and cultural features unrepresented in existing geospatial datasets (gaps to be filled through project) November 2020 January 2021
Explore approaches to integrating visual art into ecocultural map November 2020 March 2022
Summarize correspondences between ecological and cultural datasets, identifying strengths and gaps in available ecocultural information January 2021 January 2021
Identify key cultural species and ecological communities to focus on in Phase II field work January 2021 March 2022